In our previous blog, we looked at the data challenges related to data gaps in risk calculators, specifically examining those that can appear when using the Standardized Approach (SA).  However, banks taking the Internal Model Approach (IMA) face challenges of their own, including: 

  1. Data sourcing.  The revised IMA approval process proposed under the Fundamental Review of Trading Book (FRTB) rules puts the onus on banks to obtain the data for market risk calculations, as well as for developing a robust testing mechanism to obtain approval for use of internal models.  Data sourcing for IMA models present challenges such as managing complex risk factor mappings containing different asset classes; having a clear process of “non-modelable” risk factors for identification and implementation, and mapping liquidity horizons for different asset classes.   The IMA framework also specifies that the risk factors have to be supported by an external, verifiable price, rather than the internal prices many banks use for risk calculation.
  2. Assumptions.  FRTB rules detail the process for the profit and loss (P&L) attribution for the internal models, which requires full revaluation methods rather than the approximation methods banks currently use.  To use full revaluation methods, banks will need to use data for full sets of positions; they will have to create systemic assumptions to fill in the missing data.  This may not sit well with regulators, who may insist on the SA calculation in the absence of hard data to back the internal models. 
  3. Data taxonomy.  As is the case with SA, a consistent data taxonomy is essential for all risk computation within the bank.  The IMA approach calls for addressing products booked outside the normal data ecosystem, which may present bespoke data challenges. 
  4. Rules interpretation.  There are data issues related to the interpretation of the rules for Risk Theoretical P&L for satisfying the P&L attribution using the IMA approach.  This means that additional guidance is needed from the supervisors to avoid delays related to incorrect implementation of the P&L implementation models in the banks. 

In the next two blogs in this series, we will look at how banks can address FRTB data challenges, using tools such as sound data sourcing, calculation and management strategy.  

For more information see SlideShare deck: “Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) – Data Challenges

 

Visit www.accenture.com/RegulatoryCompliance for latest insights on regulatory remediation and compliance transformation.

Disclaimer

This blog is intended for general informational purposes only, does not take into account the reader’s specific circumstances, may not reflect the most current developments, and is not intended to provide advice on specific circumstances. Accenture disclaims, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, all liability for the accuracy and completeness of the information in this blog and for any acts or omissions made based on such information. Accenture does not provide legal, regulatory, audit or tax advice. Readers are responsible for obtaining such advice from their own legal counsel or other licensed professional.

About Accenture:

Accenture is a leading global professional services company, providing a broad range of services and solutions in strategy, consulting, digital, technology and operations. Combining unmatched experience and specialized skills across more than 40 industries and all business functions—underpinned by the world’s largest delivery network—Accenture works at the intersection of business and technology to help clients improve their performance and create sustainable value for their stakeholders. With more than 373,000 people serving clients in more than 120 countries, Accenture drives innovation to improve the way the world works and lives. Its home page is www.accenture.com.

Copyright © 2016 Accenture. All rights reserved.

Accenture, its logo, and High Performance Delivered are trademarks of Accenture. This document is produced by Accenture as general information on the subject. It is not intended to provide advice on your specific circumstances.

If you require advice or further details on any matters referred to, please contact your Accenture representative.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *